Earlier this month, the Supreme Court further hollowed out the Voting Rights Act, continuing a decades-long project of dismantling the legal infrastructure that protected Black suffrage. Observing the responses to the decision, The Nation’s Elie Mystal noted the distinct tenor of celebration from conservatives delighted at the possibility of vanquishing Black political power through gerrymandering.
Now the right-wing media ecosystem appears ready for the next phase of the project. If Black political gains are to be rolled back, then the historical basis for those gains must also be discredited. The Civil Rights Movement cannot remain a sacred democratic triumph if modern conservatives hope to argue that anti-discrimination laws represented a constitutional mistake.
In the trailer for a new Daily Wire series titled “The Real History of the Civil Rights Movement,” the voice of right-wing podcaster Matt Walsh drips with the practiced solemnity of a whistleblower exposed a grand conspiracy. “Since the 1990s, America’s classrooms have turned Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks into sacred Civil Rights icons,” he says. “But what if almost everything you were taught about them was wrong?” Promising to unveil a history lesson hidden from public school textbooks, Walsh ominously suggests that the mid-century crusade to dismantle Jim Crow apartheid did not merely fulfill the promise of America’s founding but fundamentally rewrote the Constitution “in ways we’re still paying for.”
Walsh treats well-documented, widely accessible historical facts as if they were buried state secrets, weaponizing the baseline historical illiteracy of his audience to construct a narrative of deception.
Walsh treats well-documented, widely accessible historical facts as if they were buried state secrets, weaponizing the baseline historical illiteracy of his audience to construct a narrative of deception. He declares with dramatic flair that the Parks story taught in schools is “fake,” asserting that she was not just a tired seamstress who spontaneously refused to surrender her seat on a Montgomery bus on Dec. 1, 1955. Instead, Walsh informs his viewers that Parks was a longtime National Association for the Advancement of Colored People volunteer instructed by civil rights leaders to “create a situation where she’d be arrested.” He points to the iconic, globally recognized photograph of Parks sitting serenely on an integrated bus, looking out the window while a white man sits directly behind her, and reveals with a flourish that the image was staged months after the event and that the man was actually a journalist.
In reality, this information has been widely known for decades. Historians and Black activists have discussed it openly for generations. The “bombshell” here is conservative audiences discovering that history classes occasionally extend beyond elementary-school simplifications.
On its surface, the controversy appears like absurd clickbait — a grown man breathlessly informing audiences that activists sometimes engage in activism. But beneath the farce lies a serious political ambition.
For years, Ben Shapiro’s digital media empire has raged against “wokeness,” mocked academic language about systemic racism and denounced any attempt to complicate America’s preferred civil rights mythology as left-wing indoctrination. Yet now the Daily Wire finds itself engaged in an unmistakably “woke” project of its own — except this supposedly comprehensive revision of the Parks story is designed not to deepen public understanding of racism, but to erode the moral legitimacy of the Civil Rights Movement.
Parks, in fact, was a longtime activist with the NAACP. Local organizers understood the strategic importance of finding a sympathetic plaintiff to challenge bus segregation in the Deep South. They had previously considered other plaintiffs — including fifteen-year-old Claudette Colvin — and ultimately concluded that Parks, a mature, married woman of sterling reputation, would present more effectively to white juries and the white press. The famous image of Parks seated on the integrated bus was staged on the historic day Montgomery’s buses were officially integrated following a Supreme Court ruling. None of this is controversial.
But Walsh smuggles in an entirely different claim beneath these factual details: that Parks was effectively a political actress participating in a manufactured hoax. He strongly implies she was instructed to orchestrate her own arrest in order to create propaganda for the movement. That is the leap for which there is no evidence. What Walsh is doing is treating the political sophistication of the Civil Rights Movement as evidence of its corruption.
This is a recurring pattern in right-wing media. Conservatives routinely encounter long-established scholarship and react as though they have uncovered a conspiracy. The assumption underlying this behavior is revealing: If they themselves did not know something, then nobody else did. Their unfamiliarity becomes proof of censorship. As Salon’s Alex Galbraith recently explained in his daily newsletter, Crash Course, Walsh assumes his viewers “weren’t paying attention when their history classes got slightly more complicated.” The entire performance depends on presenting basic historical literacy as forbidden knowledge.
Want more sharp takes on politics? Sign up for our free newsletter, Standing Room Only, written by Amanda Marcotte, now also a weekly show on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.
The irony of the Daily Wire’s historical excursion is that Walsh has stumbled into an approximation of the very historical critique that critical race theorists have advanced for decades. By transforming Parks into a meek, accidental activist whose only deficit was physical fatigue, the dominant cultural narrative effectively stripped her of her radicalism. The sanitized myth suggests that American racism was cured by a series of polite, spontaneous misunderstandings that magically dissolved when white society was gently reminded of its own conscience. Progressive critique has long demanded that students learn the truth: that dismantling Jim Crow required sophisticated, institutional organizing at the grassroots level.
But there is a darker political function here too.
The goal is not merely to reinterpret Rosa Parks. It is to redefine the boundaries of legitimate racial discourse. The broader right-wing media landscape is locked in an escalating cycle of radicalization and rewards whoever can most aggressively push the boundaries of what is permissible to say about Black people and their struggle for equality. Walsh wants audiences to stop asking whether segregation was unjust and start asking whether anti-discrimination laws themselves represented government overreach. If Parks was merely a strategically deployed prop, if the Montgomery Bus Boycott was political theater, if the Civil Rights Act was constitutional sabotage — then why should private companies be compelled to serve customers regardless of race? Once civil-rights victories are reframed as manipulative media spectacles, the legal and moral framework built upon them becomes vulnerable. This is why Walsh’s trailer focuses so heavily on whether the Civil Rights Act “rewrote the Constitution.”
Spring savings are here!
This broader assault on the historical truth is becoming increasingly explicit across the American right. In April, conservative media figures attempted to whitewash the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally violence after the Department of Justice indicted leaders connected to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche accused the SPLC of “manufacturing extremism,” and right-wing commentators immediately seized on the claim as validation of long-standing conspiracies about anti-racist organizations.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department just set up a $1.776 billion slush fund for the president to provide reparations to the Jan. 6 rioters who tried to overturn the 2020 election on his behalf — before any reparations have been paid to the descendants of slaves.
The throughline is unmistakable: The right increasingly seeks to invert the moral architecture of American racial politics. Anti-racist institutions become the real extremists. Civil-rights activists become propagandists. White grievance becomes the nation’s primary injustice. The right wants Americans to stop seeing the Civil Rights Movement as a democratic triumph and start viewing it as the moment the country went wrong.
This is right-wing wokeness.
Read more
about the Voting Rights Act
The post Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire goes woke with civil rights revisionism appeared first on Salon.com.
from Salon.com https://ift.tt/3V6Lkpn
Hello, my name is Asma E Nur. I am a tech blogger.
No comments:
Post a Comment